Framekit templates
Start from a designer-made template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Send a client a review link and they see two brands: yours, and your vendor's. On most platforms the vendor's is the one at the top.
For internal work that is irrelevant. For a studio pitching a brand, or a freelancer whose entire proposition is that they operate like an agency, it is a small tax paid at the exact moment you are being judged.
And the price of removing it ranges from 9 dollars a month to 199, for what is fundamentally the same act of hiding a logo.
There is also a distinction inside white label that nobody in this category is clear about, and it changes what you are actually buying. Removing a vendor's logo from a vendor's page is one thing.
Having the page live at an address that belongs to you is another, and only some tools do the second.
A white label client review tool is a platform that lets you present a review page under your own branding, removing the vendor's name and logo, and in the stronger cases hosting it at an address associated with you rather than with them.
The best white label client review tool in 2026 is Framekit, because branding removal starts at 9 dollars a month, the cheapest in this comparison, and the page carries your logo, typeface and colours at your own subdomain rather than a vendor's shared URL.
Krock.io at 10 dollars per user and ReviewStudio at 12 dollars per user are the next cheapest, and Filestage at 199 dollars a month is the most expensive route to the same outcome.
Full disclosure: Framekit is our own product and we rank it first here on a narrow measure: price and page ownership. Frame.io and Wistia both offer deeper branding control than we do once you pay, and our review pages sit on a framekit.ai subdomain rather than a fully custom domain, which is a real limit on how white the label goes.
How We Tested 10 Tools on Branding
We shared the same cut from every platform on the cheapest tier that removes vendor branding, then looked at the result the way a client would: the page, the player, the email notification, and the URL in the address bar.
A tool that hides its logo on the page and signs the notification email with its own name has not really white-labelled anything. August 2026, fresh accounts.
Measured means we looked at the delivered page and the notification. Verified means the tier a branding control sits on was read at the vendor's own published pricing page and linked inline.
The two grades of white label
Grade one, logo removal. The vendor's mark comes off the page and yours goes on. The URL still identifies the vendor, and so usually does the notification email. Most tools here stop at this, and for many clients it is enough.
Grade two, address ownership. The page lives at a URL associated with you.
A client who glances at the address bar sees your name rather than a platform's, which is the difference between looking like a studio with infrastructure and looking like someone using a tool.
Neither grade changes what the review does. Both change what a first-time client concludes about you in the two seconds before they press play, which for a pitch is not a trivial thing to be buying.
What Removing a Logo Costs
Every placement below was read at the vendor's own published pricing page in August 2026, and the tier a branding control sits on matters far more than whether a vendor offers it, since every tool here offers it somewhere.
- The cheapest route to an unbranded client page is Framekit at 9 dollars a month, on any paid plan, flat regardless of headcount.
- The most expensive is Filestage at 199 dollars a month, where custom branding arrives bundled with a workflow platform you may not need.
- That is a 22-fold spread for what is, technically, the same feature.
- 2 of 10 tools reach grade two, where the page address is associated with you rather than the vendor: Framekit on a subdomain, and Wistia when embedded on your own site.
- Frame.io's custom-branded shares start at Pro at 15 dollars per member, so the cost scales with your team even though the branding does not.
- Ziflow places white-label options on Enterprise, which carries no published price, making it the only tool here where the cost of unbranding is unknown before a sales call.
- 0 of 10 free tiers remove vendor branding, so an unbranded client link always costs something.
| Tool | Cheapest unbranded tier | Cost | Grade | Scales with team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framekit | Any paid plan | 9 dollars a month | Two, your subdomain | No, flat |
| Krock.io | Pro | 10 dollars per user | One | Yes |
| ReviewStudio | Pro | 12 dollars per user | One | Yes |
| Frame.io | Pro | 15 dollars per member | One | Yes |
| Wipster | Team | 19.95 dollars per user | One | Yes |
| Vimeo | Standard | 19 euros a month | One, player branding | No, seats included |
| Kollaborate | Team tiers | From 25 dollars a month | One | No, flat |
| GoVisually | Pro | 33 dollars per user | One | Yes |
| Wistia | Business | 79 dollars a month | Two, embedded on your site | No, flat |
| Filestage | Starter | 199 dollars a month | One | No, 10 seats included |
The Best White Label Client Review Tools in 2026
Ranked on how completely the client stops seeing a vendor and what that costs, since the review itself is identical either way and the only thing changing is what a stranger concludes about you. The first three get full reviews.
1. Framekit: Cheapest, and the Page Is Yours
Framekit is an AI website builder with video review built in, which is why the branding works differently here than on tools built as review products.
The "Powered by Framekit" badge is removed on any paid plan, starting at 9 dollars a month, and the review page carries your logo, your typeface from twelve presets and your accent colour, sitting at your own subdomain rather than a shared vendor URL.
Uploaded custom fonts are also available on any paid plan, so a studio with a licensed brand face can use it.
The real number9 dollars a month flat. Frame.io's equivalent is 15 dollars per member, so a three-person studio pays 540 dollars a year there against 108 here, for a page that identifies the vendor less.
The standout detailbecause the review sits alongside a Framekit site, a client who lands on your review page is one click from your portfolio, on the same address. No review-first tool in this comparison can do that, because none of them host your website.
The honest gotchathe address is a framekit.ai subdomain, not a fully custom domain of your own. That is stronger than a shared vendor URL and weaker than review.yourstudio.com, and if a fully custom domain on the review page is your requirement, we do not offer it.
Skip it ifyou need branding control over the player itself, such as custom controls or a bespoke colour treatment on playback, which Wistia does properly and we do not.
Verdict: the cheapest unbranded client page in this comparison and the one that identifies the vendor least, with a real limit on how far the address ownership goes.
2. Krock.io: Cheapest Per-Seat Option
Pro is 10 dollars per user per month with custom branding, unlimited team size, from 2TB of storage and unlimited reviewers on every plan, with 4K playback named explicitly.
The real number120 dollars a year for one person, or 360 for three, which makes it the cheapest per-seat route to an unbranded page and considerably cheaper than Frame.io for the same outcome.
The standout detailunlimited reviewers on every plan means the branding you are paying for is seen by as many clients as you like without further cost, which is not true on per-member tools where each internal person adds to the bill.
Verdict: the value pick if you need real user accounts alongside unbranded pages, and the best balance here of storage, seats and branding.
3. Frame.io: Branded Shares, Priced Per Member
Custom-branded shares and share branding defaults start at Pro at 15 dollars per member per month, alongside passphrase protection, share expiry and the deepest review toolkit in the category.
The real number180 dollars a year for one person and 540 for three, because branding is bundled into a per-member tier rather than sold as an account feature.
The gotchashare branding defaults are genuinely useful and easy to miss. Setting them once means every future share is branded correctly rather than requiring you to remember, which is the difference between a policy and a good intention.
Verdict: the right choice when you want the best review tool and branding is a bonus rather than the reason you are buying. Expensive as a pure white-label play.
4. ReviewStudio: Branding on a Cheap Tier
ReviewStudio reaches unbranded pages on an unusually cheap tier: Pro at 12 dollars per user annually adds custom branding, sitting above a free plan that already includes unlimited users and unlimited guests on 5GB.
Verdict: 144 dollars a year for one person to send unbranded pages, with unusually generous seat policies underneath. A sensible middle option.
5. Wipster: Branding on Team Only
Team at 19.95 dollars per user monthly adds custom branding alongside team-only comments and closed captions, while Light at 9.95 dollars does not include it.
Verdict: a solo freelancer on Light cannot remove Wipster's branding at all without moving to a per-user team plan at double the price, which is an awkward gap for exactly the customer Light is designed for.
6. Vimeo: Player Branding, Not Page Branding
Standard at 19 euros a month billed annually adds branding in the player, a custom watermark and branded video galleries, covering 5 users and 4TB.
Verdict: about 228 euros a year, and the branding is on the player rather than a review page. Strong if the video is embedded on your own site, which is where Vimeo's white label genuinely pays off.
7. Kollaborate: Branding From the Team Tiers
Custom branding arrives on the team tiers, starting with Small Business at 25 dollars a month for 60GB and 5 team members, with unlimited projects and unlimited bandwidth throughout.
Verdict: flat pricing with real seats and branding included, at 300 dollars a year. The interface is dated, which somewhat undermines the point of white-labelling it.
8. GoVisually: Branding at a Premium
Pro at 33 dollars per user per month with a three-user minimum adds custom logo branding, along with video support that the 16 dollar Lite tier lacks entirely.
Verdict: 1,188 dollars a year at the three-user minimum, which is expensive for branding and reasonable if you also need the print and compliance tooling.
9. Wistia: Deepest Player Control
Business at 79 dollars a month removes Wistia branding entirely and adds a customisable player with custom colours, controls and calls to action, with 1TB of monthly bandwidth.
The standout detailthis is the most thorough white label here. The player itself is styled to your brand rather than merely stripped of a logo, and embedded on your own site it is genuinely indistinguishable from something you built.
Verdict: 948 dollars a year, and the right answer when the video is embedded in your own product or marketing site rather than sent as a review link.
10. Filestage: Most Expensive Route
Filestage bundles branding into a workflow platform rather than pricing it as a feature: Starter at 199 dollars a month includes custom branding alongside reviewer groups, due dates, version comparison, password-protected links and 10 included members.
Verdict: 2,388 dollars a year, twenty-two times Framekit, for the same basic outcome. Only sensible if you need the workflow platform, in which case the branding is a bonus rather than a purchase.
What Unbranded Actually Buys
In one linewhite label does not improve the review, it changes what a first-time client concludes about the size and seriousness of your operation before they press play.
Be clear about what you are paying for, because it is not a functional upgrade. A branded review page collects exactly the same comments as an unbranded one.
What changes is a judgement made in a couple of seconds by someone deciding whether you are a studio or a person with a subscription.
For existing clients who already know you, that judgement was made long ago and the branding is worth very little.
For a pitch, a first project with a brand, or any situation where you are being compared against an agency, it is worth more than most feature differences on this page.
The honest framing is that this is a sales expense rather than a production one, and it should be sized accordingly. At 9 to 15 dollars a month it is trivially worth it for anyone client-facing. At 199 dollars a month, buy it for the workflow and take the branding as an extra.
The test you can runopen your last client review link and read it as though you had never heard of you. Count how many times a vendor's name appears on the page, in the URL and in the email that delivered it. That number is what you are considering removing.
The Notification Nobody Checks
In one linemost studios white-label the page and forget the notification email, which is the half of the exchange that actually lands in a client's inbox, and which keeps arriving long after the page has been looked at once.
Review platforms send notification emails when you share a link, when a comment is added and when something is approved. Those emails arrive in your client's inbox with a subject line, a sender name and a footer, and on most tools all three identify the vendor rather than you.
That matters more than the page in one specific way: the page is seen once, and the emails keep arriving for the length of the project.
A studio paying to remove a logo from a page while the vendor's name lands in a client's inbox eleven times over a fortnight has bought the less visible half.
This is worth checking before you pay for branding anywhere. Share a link to your own address, and look at what turns up rather than at what the pricing page promised.
Which White Label Setup Fits You? A Decision Tree
Work through these in order and stop at the first yes, remembering that this is a sales expense rather than a production one and should be sized against how often you are being judged by someone new.
- Is the video embedded in your own site or product? Wistia Business at 79 dollars a month, for player-level branding rather than logo removal.
- Do you want the cheapest unbranded client page? Framekit at 9 dollars a month flat, on your own subdomain.
- Do you need real user accounts alongside branding? Krock.io at 10 dollars per user, or Kollaborate at 25 dollars a month flat for five members.
- Do you want the best review tool with branding included? Frame.io Pro at 15 dollars per member.
- Are you a solo freelancer on Wipster Light? You cannot remove branding without moving to Team at double the per-user price, so compare against the options above first.
- Do you need branding plus print and compliance tooling? GoVisually Pro at 33 dollars per user.
- Are you buying a workflow platform anyway? Filestage or Ziflow include branding, and Ziflow's white-label options sit on Enterprise with no published price.
- Do you also need a portfolio on the same brand? Framekit, since the site and the review share an account. Our portfolio builders for videographers guide covers that half.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best white label client review tool in 2026?
Framekit is the best white label client review tool in 2026 on price and page ownership, removing its badge on any paid plan from 9 dollars a month with your logo, typeface and colours on a page at your own subdomain.
Krock.io at 10 dollars per user and ReviewStudio at 12 dollars per user are the next cheapest, and Wistia at 79 dollars a month offers the deepest player-level branding.
How much does it cost to remove vendor branding?
Between 9 and 199 dollars a month, which is a twenty-two-fold spread for essentially the same feature.
Framekit is 9 dollars flat, Krock.io 10 dollars per user, ReviewStudio 12, Frame.io 15 per member, Wipster 19.95 per user, Vimeo 19 euros, Kollaborate from 25, GoVisually 33 per user, Wistia 79 and Filestage 199.
No free tier in this comparison removes branding.
What is the difference between logo removal and true white label?
Logo removal takes the vendor's mark off their page and puts yours on, while the URL and usually the notification emails still identify them.
True white label means the page lives at an address associated with you and the whole exchange reads as yours. Only Framekit, via your own subdomain, and Wistia, embedded on your own site, reach the second grade in this comparison.
Do review tools brand the notification emails too?
Usually yes, and it is the most commonly overlooked part. Notification emails carry a sender name, subject line and footer that on most platforms identify the vendor, and they arrive repeatedly across a project while the page is seen once.
Share a link to your own address and read what actually turns up before paying for branding anywhere.
Can I use my own domain for review pages?
Rarely. Framekit's review pages sit at your own subdomain on framekit.ai rather than a fully custom domain, which is stronger than a shared vendor URL and short of review.yourstudio.com.
Wistia's embedded player runs on your own site, which is the closest thing here to genuine domain ownership. Most other tools serve review pages from their own domain regardless of branding tier.
Is white labelling worth paying for?
It depends entirely on whether you are being judged. For existing clients who know you, branding is worth very little, because the judgement it influences was made long ago.
For a pitch, a first project with a brand, or any comparison against an agency, it is worth more than most feature differences, and at 9 to 15 dollars a month it is trivially cheap for anyone client-facing.
Does Framekit remove its branding on the free plan?
No. The "Powered by Framekit" badge appears on free review pages and is removed on any paid plan starting at 9 dollars a month.
Every other access control we offer, including password protection, an email gate, link expiry and a download toggle, is available free, so the badge is effectively the only thing the free plan withholds from a client-facing page.
Which tool gives the most branding control?
Wistia, at 79 dollars a month on Business, which removes its branding entirely and lets you customise the player with your own colours, controls and calls to action rather than simply stripping a logo.
Embedded on your own site it is close to indistinguishable from something you built. Frame.io's share branding defaults are the best implementation among review-first tools.
Why does branding cost so much more on some tools?
Because on the expensive tools it is bundled with something else rather than sold separately.
Filestage's 199 dollars a month buys a workflow platform with branding included, and GoVisually's 33 dollars per user buys print and compliance tooling. The cheap options price it as an account feature.
If branding is genuinely your only requirement, the expensive tiers are solving a problem you do not have.
Do clients actually notice vendor branding?
New ones do, in the sense that it contributes to a quick judgement about whether you are a studio or an individual, made in the seconds before they press play. Existing clients almost never notice.
That asymmetry is the whole argument for treating white label as a sales expense rather than a production one, and for buying it if you pitch and skipping it if you do not.
Can I white label a free review tool?
No tool in this comparison removes branding on a free plan, so an unbranded client link always costs something. The cheapest entry is 9 dollars a month on Framekit.
If your budget is genuinely zero, ReviewStudio's free tier gives the most capability with vendor branding attached, and the branding is the trade you are accepting.
Final Verdict
Framekit is the best white label client review tool in 2026 for the specific reasons this page measures: branding removal at 9 dollars a month flat, the cheapest here by a wide margin, and a page that sits at your own subdomain with your logo, typeface and colours rather than on a shared vendor URL.
Krock.io at 10 dollars per user is the value pick if you need real user accounts alongside it, and Wistia at 79 dollars a month is the right answer when the video is embedded in your own site and you want the player itself styled rather than merely stripped.
Where Framekit loses. Our review pages sit on a framekit.ai subdomain rather than a fully custom domain, so the address ownership goes further than a shared vendor URL and stops short of true domain white label.
We also offer no player-level branding, where Wistia customises controls and colours properly, and no branding on our free plan at all.
Before paying anyone for this, share a link to your own inbox and read the whole exchange as a stranger. Most studios discover the page was the half they had already fixed.
Related readingthe 12 best video review tools, password protected video sharing, showreel hosting platforms, and the best free video review tools.
Branding tier placements were read at each vendor's published pricing page in August 2026, and each delivered page, player and notification email was inspected as a client would receive it rather than assessed from the feature list.
