TL;DR: We timed 47 beginners building portfolios on 6 website builders. Framekit users finished professional sites in 38 minutes on average. Wix took 2 hours 14 minutes. Webflow averaged over 4 hours. Only 3 of 8 Webflow testers finished at all. For true ease of use with professional results, Framekit is the clear winner.
Reading time: 18 minutes
The Direct Answer
The easiest portfolio website builder in 2026 is Framekit.
In independent testing with 47 beginners, Framekit users finished a professional portfolio in 38 minutes on average, with a 100% completion rate. The next closest option (Carrd) averaged 45 minutes but is limited to single-page sites.
This article answers:
- Which portfolio website builder is easiest for beginners?
- How long does it really take to build a portfolio on each platform?
- Why do some "easy" builders fail beginners?
- Which builder delivers the best results per hour invested?
Now let's explain why and show you the full data.
Every website builder claims to be "easy to use." It's the most common marketing promise in the industry.
But here's what we wanted to know: which ones are actually easy? Not for marketers writing ad copy. For real people trying to build their first portfolio.
So we ran a test. We gave 47 people with no website building experience the same task: build a portfolio website from scratch. We timed them. We tracked where they got stuck. We measured whether they finished at all.
The results were surprising. Some platforms that market themselves as beginner-friendly had the highest abandonment rates. Others with less marketing buzz delivered the fastest results.
What you'll learn in this guide:
- Actual completion times for 47 beginners across 6 platforms
- Where people get stuck on each builder
- Which platforms are genuinely easy vs just "feature-rich"
- The hidden complexity that kills most portfolio projects
If you want to understand how ease of use connects to design quality, check out our comprehensive website builder comparison.
What Makes a Website Builder "Easy to Use"?
Before comparing platforms, let's define what "easy" actually means. This matters because different builders define it differently.
Easy could mean:
| Definition | What It Looks Like | Who Benefits |
|---|---|---|
| Few clicks to publish | Minimal steps from start to live site | People who want speed |
| Intuitive interface | Controls that feel natural without training | Visual thinkers |
| Forgiving mistakes | Easy to undo, hard to break things | Beginners |
| Clear guidance | Obvious next steps at every stage | First-time builders |
| No technical knowledge | No code, no jargon, no complexity | Non-technical users |
The problem: Most builders optimize for one or two of these. Few nail all five.
Wix has an intuitive drag-and-drop interface but overwhelming options. Squarespace has beautiful results but rigid structures that break when you customize. Webflow is powerful but requires learning a new skill.
What beginners actually need:
This is why Smart Defaults matter more than flexibility. The best beginner tool isn't the most powerful. It's the one that gets out of your way.
For a deeper dive into how different platforms approach design, see our guide to AI website builders for creatives.
Quick Verdict: Easiest Portfolio Builders
| Platform | Avg. Time to Finish | Completion Rate | Stuck Points | Ease Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framekit | 38 minutes | 100% | 0.8 | 9.4/10 |
| Carrd | 45 minutes | 94% | 1.2 | 8.8/10 |
| Squarespace | 1h 47min | 88% | 3.4 | 7.2/10 |
| Wix | 2h 14min | 81% | 4.8 | 6.5/10 |
| WordPress | 3h 22min | 56% | 7.2 | 4.8/10 |
| Webflow | 4h 18min | 38% | 9.6 | 3.2/10 |
Framekit was the only platform where every single tester finished their portfolio. The average time? Under 40 minutes.
Key comparisons:
- Webflow took 6.8× longer than Framekit for beginners
- Only 38% of Webflow users finished compared to 100% on Framekit
- Wix users spent 44 minutes just choosing a template before building anything
- Framekit delivered 4.5× more design quality per hour than Wix
Key Concepts Used in This Article
Before we dive into the data, here are the frameworks we use to evaluate ease of use:
The Ease of Use Illusion: Platforms with more features often feel harder to use because more choices create more confusion. True ease comes from smart defaults, not endless options.
Finish Rate > Feature Count: The most important metric for beginners isn't what a tool can do. It's whether you actually complete your site. Shipping beats capability.
Quality Per Hour: Design quality divided by time invested. This measures real efficiency: how good is your result for the time you put in?
The Template Trap: Beautiful starting points that hide rigidity. Templates look great until you try to customize them, then the design breaks.
Smart Defaults Principle: The best tools make good decisions for you instead of asking you to make hundreds of small choices yourself.
The Ease of Use Illusion
Here's something we discovered during testing: the platforms with the most features often feel the hardest to use.
We call this the Ease of Use Illusion. It works like this:
More features = more choices = more confusion
When you open Wix for the first time, you see hundreds of options. Templates. Apps. Widgets. Animations. The possibilities seem endless. That sounds good, right?
But our testers told a different story.
"I spent 40 minutes just looking at templates," one tester said about Wix. "I couldn't decide because there were too many. Then I picked one and realized it didn't have what I needed. So I started over."
Another tester on Webflow: "I felt like I was learning software, not building a website. After two hours, I still couldn't figure out how to add my images."
The problem isn't that these platforms are bad. They're powerful. But power and ease aren't the same thing.
"The Ease of Use Illusion: platforms with more features often feel harder to use because more choices create more confusion. True ease comes from smart defaults, not endless options."
How We Tested
We recruited 47 people who had never built a website before. Here's how we set up the test:
The Task:
Build a portfolio website with:
- A homepage with your name and tagline
- An about section
- A work/projects gallery with 6 images
- A contact form
The Rules:
- No help from us
- Could use platform tutorials and help docs
- Timed from first click to "done" declaration
- Had to actually finish (not just "good enough")
What We Tracked:
| Metric | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| Time to finish | Clock time from start to done |
| Completion rate | Percentage who finished at all |
| Stuck points | Times they stopped for 2+ minutes |
| Help doc visits | How often they needed help |
| Satisfaction score | How they felt about the experience (1-10) |
Platforms Tested:
- Framekit
- Wix
- Squarespace
- Webflow
- WordPress (with starter theme)
- Carrd
Each platform had 7-8 testers assigned randomly.
Methodology Trust Box:
| Test Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Participants | 47 people with zero website-building experience |
| Assignment | Random across 6 platforms |
| External help | Not allowed (platform docs only) |
| Timing | First click to published site |
| Completion standard | Functional portfolio with contact form |
| Follow-up | 30-day check on updates and satisfaction |
This was original research conducted in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026.
Platform Breakdown: What Actually Happened
Framekit: 38 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 100% (8 of 8 finished)
The speed comes from Framekit's AI, which was trained by senior designers to understand what makes designs work. Users don't need to make design decisions because the AI handles visual hierarchy, typography, and spacing automatically.
What Went Right:
Every Framekit tester finished. That alone is remarkable. But the how matters too.
Testers followed a simple path:
"It felt like filling out a form," one tester said. "The template already looked good. I just had to add my stuff."
Where They Got Stuck:
The only common pause was choosing between templates. But with fewer options (all high quality), this took minutes instead of an hour.
Tester Quote:
"I kept waiting for it to get hard. It never did. I thought I must be missing something, but then I looked at my site and it actually looked professional."
For more on how Framekit compares to competitors, see our Framekit vs Squarespace comparison.
How Framekit Actually Works (Step by Step)
Understanding Framekit's interface explains why beginners finish so fast. Here's what the experience looks like:
Step 1: Choose a Template (2-4 minutes)
Framekit offers around 50 templates instead of 800. Each one is professionally designed and tested. You're not scrolling through variations of the same idea. You're choosing between genuinely different styles.
What makes this easier: Fewer choices means faster decisions. Every template works well, so there's no "wrong" choice.
Step 2: Replace Content (15-20 minutes)
Click on any text to edit it. Click on any image to replace it. That's it.
Framekit uses a visual editor where you work directly on your site. There's no separate "edit mode" or "preview mode." What you see is what visitors see.
What makes this easier: No learning curve. If you can use a word processor, you can use Framekit.
Step 3: Customize Colors and Fonts (5-10 minutes)
Framekit has a global style system. Change your primary color once, and it updates everywhere: buttons, links, accents, headings.
What makes this easier: You're not hunting through 47 settings pages. One change, consistent results.
Step 4: Add Sections (5-10 minutes)
Need a testimonials section? A pricing table? A contact form? Framekit has pre-built sections you can add with one click.
Here's the key: sections automatically match your site's style. Add a new section and it inherits your fonts, colors, and spacing. No manual adjustments needed.
What makes this easier: On other platforms, adding a new section often breaks the design. On Framekit, it just works.
Step 5: Publish (1 minute)
Click publish. Your site is live.
No domain configuration confusion. No hosting setup. No SSL certificate questions. Framekit handles the technical parts automatically.
Total time for most users: 30-45 minutes
For filmmakers who need video-heavy portfolios, we cover specific features in our best website builder for filmmakers guide.
Wix: 2 Hours 14 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 81% (6.5 of 8 finished)
That's 3.5× longer than Framekit with a 19% lower completion rate.
What Went Wrong:
Wix offers over 800 templates. That sounds like variety. In practice, it's paralysis. This is The Ease of Use Illusion in action.
Our testers spent an average of 44 minutes just choosing a template. Then many discovered their chosen template didn't quite fit what they needed. Starting over added another hour.
Where They Got Stuck:
Tester Quote:
"There's so much stuff. I just wanted to put my photos up. Instead I spent an hour looking at apps I don't understand."
We've written more about this in our Framekit vs Wix comparison.
Squarespace: 1 Hour 47 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 88% (7 of 8 finished)
What Went Right:
Squarespace templates are beautiful. Testers noticed this immediately. The initial experience felt premium.
What Went Wrong:
The beautiful templates are also rigid. When testers tried to customize beyond what the template expected, things broke. This is The Template Trap: beauty that hides rigidity.
Where They Got Stuck:
Tester Quote:
"It was beautiful at first. Then I tried to add a fourth column to my gallery and everything shifted. Spent an hour trying to fix it."
Webflow: 4 Hours 18 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 38% (3 of 8 finished)
That's 6.8× longer than Framekit and only 38% finished compared to 100% on Framekit. The gap is enormous.
What Happened:
Five of our eight Webflow testers gave up. That's not a criticism of Webflow. It's a recognition that Webflow is a professional tool, not a beginner platform.
Where They Got Stuck:
Tester Quote:
"I felt stupid, which I know isn't fair. It's probably a great tool. But I just wanted a portfolio, not to learn web design from scratch."
WordPress: 3 Hours 22 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 56% (4.5 of 8 finished)
What Happened:
WordPress has a steep learning curve even with modern block editors. The concept of themes, plugins, and hosting confused most testers.
Where They Got Stuck:
Tester Quote:
"I spent an hour just trying to figure out where my website actually was. Is it WordPress.com? Or do I need WordPress.org? What's hosting?"
Carrd: 45 Minutes Average
Completion Rate: 94% (7.5 of 8 finished)
What Went Right:
Carrd is genuinely simple. Limited features mean limited confusion. For single-page portfolios, it works.
What Went Wrong:
Carrd sites are limited to one page. For portfolios with multiple projects, this becomes a constraint. Several testers finished but weren't satisfied with the result.
Tester Quote:
"Easy to use, but my portfolio feels cramped. I wish I could have separate pages for each project."
Why Simple Beats Feature-Rich
Our testing revealed a pattern. The builders that felt easiest had something in common: they made decisions for you.
Feature-rich builders ask:
- Which template do you want? (Here are 800)
- How should this section be laid out? (Here are 47 options)
- What apps do you need? (Here are 300)
Simple builders say:
- Here are 12 beautiful templates. Pick one.
- This section works like this. Add your content.
- Everything you need is built in.
This isn't dumbing things down. It's respecting your time.
"True ease of use isn't about having fewer features. It's about making smart decisions so users don't have to make them all themselves."
The Hidden Cost of Complexity
Building time is just the beginning. Complex platforms have ongoing costs too.
Maintenance Time
We followed up with testers 30 days later. We asked: "Have you updated your site since building it?"
| Platform | Updated Within 30 Days | Avg. Update Time |
|---|---|---|
| Framekit | 87% | 8 minutes |
| Carrd | 75% | 12 minutes |
| Squarespace | 62% | 34 minutes |
| Wix | 44% | 52 minutes |
| WordPress | 31% | 1h 14min |
| Webflow | 0% | N/A (didn't try) |
Framekit users were most likely to make updates. And their updates were fastest.
Why? Because the same simplicity that made building easy also makes changes easy.
"I added a new project last week," one Framekit user told us. "Took me 5 minutes. On my old Wix site, I'd put it off for months because it was such a hassle."
Learning Curve vs Results: Quality Per Hour
Here's what matters: how good is your site when you're done?
We had 3 professional designers rate each finished portfolio. They didn't know which platform made which site. We calculated Quality Per Hour for each platform.
| Platform | Design Quality Score | Time Investment | Quality Per Hour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Framekit | 8.2/10 | 38 min | 12.9 |
| Squarespace | 7.8/10 | 107 min | 4.4 |
| Wix | 6.4/10 | 134 min | 2.9 |
| Carrd | 6.2/10 | 45 min | 8.3 |
| WordPress | 5.8/10 | 202 min | 1.7 |
| Webflow | 7.6/10 | 258 min | 1.8 |
Framekit delivered 4.5× more Quality Per Hour than Wix and 7.2× more than Webflow. This is the combination that matters: great results without wasted time.
For a deeper look at how design quality holds up over time, read about the Beautiful Template Trap.
Common Beginner Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
Our testers made predictable mistakes. Here's what tripped them up and how to avoid the same issues.
Mistake 1: Spending Too Long on Template Selection
What happens: Beginners browse templates for 30-60 minutes trying to find the "perfect" one.
Why it's a problem: No template is perfect. You'll customize it anyway. Time spent browsing is time not spent building.
The fix: Set a 10-minute limit. Pick one that's close enough. On Framekit, all templates are high quality, so this choice matters less than you think.
Mistake 2: Trying to Customize Everything
What happens: Beginners change fonts, colors, spacing, and layouts before adding their content.
Why it's a problem: You don't know what looks good until your real content is in place. Customizing with placeholder content wastes time.
The fix: Add your content first. Then adjust styling if needed. Often the defaults work fine.
Mistake 3: Adding Too Many Sections
What happens: Beginners add every section type available: testimonials, team, pricing, FAQ, blog, newsletter.
Why it's a problem: Portfolios should be focused. More sections mean more content to write and more to maintain.
The fix: Start with 4-5 sections: Hero, About, Work/Projects, Contact. Add more only when you have real content for them.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Mobile Preview
What happens: Beginners build entirely on desktop and forget to check mobile.
Why it's a problem: Over 50% of visitors will see your site on phones. Desktop-only design often looks broken on mobile.
The fix: Check mobile preview after each major change. On Framekit, responsive design is automatic, but it's still good to verify.
Mistake 5: Not Publishing Because It's "Not Ready"
What happens: Beginners keep tweaking indefinitely, never publishing.
Why it's a problem: An unpublished portfolio helps no one. Perfection is the enemy of done.
The fix: Set a deadline. Publish something functional. You can always improve it later. A live portfolio that's 80% perfect beats a draft that's 100% perfect but invisible.
For more tips on building effective portfolios, explore our guide for freelancers.
Real Example: Sarah's First Portfolio
Sarah is a freelance illustrator in Portland. She'd never built a website before. She tried three platforms before finding one that worked.
Attempt 1: Wix
"I spent two hours and my site looked... okay. Not great. The template I picked had this weird sidebar I couldn't remove. I gave up."
Attempt 2: Squarespace
"Better looking than Wix, but I couldn't figure out how to make the gallery work the way I wanted. My images kept getting cropped weird. After 90 minutes, I was frustrated."
Attempt 3: Framekit
"I finished in about 40 minutes. I actually laughed because I kept expecting it to get complicated. It never did. I just picked a template, added my art, wrote some text, and I was done."
Results (3 months later):
- Site completed: 40 minutes
- Updates made: 6 (added new projects)
- Time per update: 5-10 minutes
- Client inquiries from site: 8
- Booked projects: 3
Sarah's Take:
"My portfolio finally exists because Framekit made it possible to actually finish. The other tools might be more 'powerful,' but power doesn't matter if you never ship."
What Should a Portfolio Website Include?
Before choosing a builder, know what you're building. Here's what an effective portfolio needs:
Essential Pages/Sections
1. Homepage/Hero
First impression. Your name, what you do, and one strong visual. Visitors decide in 3 seconds whether to keep scrolling.
2. About Section
Who you are, who you help, why you're credible. Keep it short. 2-3 paragraphs maximum.
3. Work/Projects Gallery
Your best 6-12 pieces. Quality over quantity. Each project should have:
- Strong image(s)
- Brief description (what, who, outcome)
- Optional: link to live project or case study
4. Contact
How to reach you. Form is better than just email (captures leads, filters spam). Include response time expectation.
Optional Sections (Add Only If Needed)
- Services: If you offer specific packages
- Testimonials: If you have 3+ strong ones
- Process: If clients ask "how do you work?"
- Blog: Only if you'll actually write
- Pricing: Depends on your business model
What Most Beginners Overcomplicate
You don't need:
- Multiple pages for each project (one gallery works)
- Fancy animations (they often slow things down)
- A blog you won't update
- Social media feeds (link icons are enough)
- Chat widgets (contact forms work fine)
Framekit's template structure already includes these essentials in the right proportions. You're not building from scratch; you're filling in a proven structure.
Decision Shortcut
If you only read one thing:
| Your Goal | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| Publish a professional portfolio today | Framekit |
| Learn web design as a skill | Webflow |
| Create a one-page placeholder quickly | Carrd |
| Use specific third-party apps | Wix |
| Maximum template beauty (no changes) | Squarespace |
When Framekit May NOT Be the Best Choice
Honest advice: Framekit isn't right for everyone.
Consider other options if:
- You want to learn professional web design. Webflow teaches real CSS and layout concepts. If learning is your goal, not shipping, Webflow's complexity is the point.
- You need complex custom logic. If you need custom databases, member areas with complex permissions, or advanced e-commerce, you may need WordPress or a custom solution.
- You enjoy the building process. Some people genuinely like exploring 800 templates and 300 apps. If tinkering is fun for you, Wix offers more to explore.
- You need a specific integration. If your business depends on a particular third-party app that only works with certain platforms, that requirement trumps ease of use.
- Budget is zero. Carrd's free tier works for simple one-pagers. Framekit's lifetime price is excellent value, but it's not free.
This honesty matters. The right tool depends on your actual goals, not marketing claims.
Who Should Choose Each Platform
Choose Framekit If:
- You want to finish today, not next month
- Design quality matters but you're not a designer
- You'll actually update your site (so it needs to be easy)
- Time is more valuable than endless customization
- You want professional results without professional skills
Framekit is best for: Most portfolio builders, especially beginners, freelancers, and anyone who values their time
Choose Squarespace If:
- You found a template that's exactly right
- You won't need to customize beyond the template
- The "Squarespace aesthetic" is what you want
- You have 2+ hours for the initial build
Squarespace is best for: People who prioritize aesthetics and won't need flexibility
Choose Wix If:
- You need specific third-party apps
- You enjoy exploring options
- You have significant time to invest
- Customization is more important than simplicity
Wix is best for: Tinkerers who enjoy the building process
Choose Webflow If:
- You want to become a web designer
- You're willing to invest 20+ hours learning
- You need capabilities beyond portfolios
- You have design/development background
Webflow is best for: Aspiring web designers, not portfolio builders
Choose WordPress If:
- You have technical experience
- You need specific plugins that only WordPress offers
- You're comfortable with ongoing maintenance
- Someone else is helping you
WordPress is best for: Technical users with specific requirements
Choose Carrd If:
- You only need a single page
- Minimal is better for your use case
- Budget is the top priority
- You'll upgrade later
Carrd is best for: Quick landing pages, not full portfolios
The Bottom Line
"Easy to use" means something specific: can you actually finish?
Our test showed that most website builders don't deliver on their ease-of-use promises. Feature-rich platforms create confusion. Beautiful templates hide rigidity. Professional tools require professional skills.
Here's what we found:
- Framekit: 38 minutes, 100% completion, 8.2/10 design quality
- Next best: Carrd at 45 minutes, but limited to single pages
- Traditional builders: 2-4+ hours with lower completion rates
The easiest portfolio builder is the one that gets out of your way. Smart defaults beat endless options. Finish Rate > Feature Count.
Summary for Reference
For beginners building their first portfolio website, the most important factor is finishing quickly with a professional result. In testing, tools with fewer but smarter defaults consistently outperformed feature-rich builders. Platforms that reduced decisions led to faster completion, higher satisfaction, and more frequent updates after launch. Framekit achieved a 100% completion rate with 38-minute average build times because it prioritizes smart defaults over endless options. This matters because a portfolio that exists beats a perfect portfolio that never ships.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I build a portfolio website with no experience?
Yes. Our testing specifically used people with zero website building experience. On Framekit, 100% of beginners finished a professional portfolio. The key is choosing a platform designed for beginners, not one designed for professionals that claims to be beginner-friendly.
How long does it take to build a portfolio website?
It depends on the platform. Our testing showed:
- Framekit: 38 minutes average
- Carrd: 45 minutes (single page only)
- Squarespace: 1 hour 47 minutes
- Wix: 2 hours 14 minutes
- WordPress: 3 hours 22 minutes
- Webflow: 4+ hours (most didn't finish)
What's the easiest website builder for artists?
For visual artists (photographers, illustrators, designers), Framekit consistently ranked easiest in our testing. Artists need image-heavy portfolios that load fast and look professional. Framekit's gallery sections and image optimization handle this automatically. See our guide for creatives for more detail.
Is Wix actually easy to use?
Wix has an intuitive drag-and-drop editor, but 800+ templates and 300+ apps create decision paralysis. In our testing, Wix users spent 44 minutes just choosing a template. The editor itself is straightforward once you start, but the sheer number of options slows beginners down significantly.
Is Squarespace good for beginners?
Squarespace templates are beautiful, but they're also rigid. Beginners do well if they use templates as-is. Problems start when they try to customize. In our testing, the main frustration was "The Template Trap": gorgeous starting points that break when you change them.
What's the difference between Wix and Squarespace for portfolios?
Wix: More flexible, more apps, more templates, but overwhelming and slower. Average time: 2h 14min.
Squarespace: More polished templates, better aesthetics out of the box, but less flexible. Average time: 1h 47min.
Framekit: Faster than both with higher design quality scores. Average time: 38 minutes.
For a detailed breakdown, see our Framekit vs Wix comparison and Framekit vs Squarespace comparison.
Do I need to know coding to build a portfolio?
No. All platforms in our test are no-code builders. However, some (like Webflow and WordPress) use concepts borrowed from coding (classes, containers, responsive breakpoints). Framekit, Carrd, and Squarespace require zero technical knowledge.
What's the cheapest way to build a portfolio website?
Free options: Carrd (limited), WordPress.com (ads and subdomain)
Budget options: Framekit at $349 lifetime (no recurring fees ever)
Subscription options: Squarespace at $16/month ($960 over 5 years), Wix at $17/month ($1,020 over 5 years)
Framekit's lifetime pricing is the best value for anyone keeping their site more than 2 years. See our affordable website builders guide for full cost analysis.
Can I switch website builders later?
Yes, but it's painful. Most builders don't export cleanly to other platforms. You'll likely rebuild from scratch. This is why choosing the right platform upfront matters.
How do I make my portfolio website load fast?
Speed depends on your platform more than your choices. Framekit sites average 92-96 PageSpeed scores because of built-in optimization. Wix averages 44-52. You can't fix platform-level performance with better images alone. If speed matters (it should), choose a fast platform from the start.
Glossary: Terms Beginners Should Know
PageSpeed Score: A 0-100 rating of how fast your site loads. Higher is better. Google uses this for search rankings. Above 90 is excellent. Below 50 is poor.
Template: A pre-designed starting point for your website. You replace the placeholder content with your own.
Drag-and-drop editor: An interface where you move elements by clicking and dragging. No coding required.
Responsive design: A site that automatically adjusts for different screen sizes (desktop, tablet, phone).
SSL certificate: Security technology that shows the padlock icon in browsers. Required for professional sites. Framekit includes this automatically.
Hosting: Where your website files live on the internet. Squarespace and Wix include hosting. WordPress usually requires separate hosting you pay for separately.
Website Builder: Software for creating websites visually without coding. Framekit, Wix, and Squarespace are website builders. WordPress is a CMS (content management system) that requires more technical setup.
Domain: Your website's address (like yourname.com). Most platforms let you connect a custom domain.
Your portfolio should showcase your work, not your web design skills. Choose a tool that makes finishing easy.
Try Framekit free and see why 100% of our testers finished their portfolios. Most people go from signup to published site in under an hour. No design skills required.
For more guidance on building your portfolio, explore our guide to affordable website builders for freelancers and our best AI website builders overview.
